Methodology
The research adopted a structured, hypothesis-driven approach to evaluate stablecoins as a transformative onchain financial tool. The methodology included:
Data collection and analysis
- Quantitative analysis
- Data scope: Analysis of transaction volumes, adoption rates, and revenues from stablecoin projects (e.g., Tether, USDC) compared to traditional payment networks (e.g., Visa, Mastercard) up to Q3 2024.
- Key metrics: The comparison focuses on efficiency, cost savings, and scalability to demonstrate the value stablecoins bring to both businesses and consumers.
- Outcome: Highlights how stablecoins outperform traditional systems in terms of transaction efficiency, cost reductions, and yield-generation opportunities.
- Case studies
- Selected examples:
- PayPal (PYUSD): A case study showcasing cost efficiencies and increased user adoption through stablecoin integration.
- Stripe (USDC): Demonstrates how stablecoins streamline payment processes for global businesses.
- Purpose: To provide real-world examples of stablecoins’ strategic and operational benefits in different industries.
- Classification of economies
- Framework used: This report classifies countries as either “Advanced Economies” or “Emerging and Developing Economies” based on the IMF Data on Advanced Economies and Emerging and Developing Economies.
- Relevance: This classification enables a structured analysis of how stablecoin adoption varies across different economic contexts, providing insights into tailored use cases and regional trends.
- Secondary sources
- Literature review: Includes analysis of industry reports, academic papers, and market insights related to stablecoin applications and their regulatory environments.
- Regulatory documents: Provides an understanding of global regulatory landscapes, focusing on emerging challenges and opportunities for stablecoin integration.
- Expert interviews
- Participants: Conversations with industry professionals, including blockchain developers, payment service providers, and regulatory experts.
- Focus areas:
- Trends in stablecoin adoption and innovation.
- Challenges in regulation and compliance.
- Insights into future opportunities for stablecoin applications in business models.
- Outcome: This report adds qualitative depth to the quantitative data and case studies, providing a holistic view of stablecoin business models.
Survey methodology
The survey captured responses from 1,450 participants divided into the following four segments:
- Consumers in advanced economies: 350 respondents.
- Consumers in emerging economies: 365 respondents.
- Businesses in advanced economies: 370 respondents.
- Businesses in emerging economies: 365 respondents.
Participants represented a mix of individuals and businesses of various sizes. Most were active cryptocurrency users, often with full-time jobs or entrepreneurial backgrounds, offering diverse perspectives. The survey’s classification of countries followed the IMF’s “Advanced Economies” and “Emerging and Developing Economies” categories to ensure accurate segmentation.
Survey limitations:
- Sample size: While responses allow identification of broad trends, they do not support statistically robust group comparisons.
- Sample bias: The majority of respondents were already familiar with cryptocurrency, which may skew results toward more favorable views on stablecoin adoption.
- Geographic constraints: The findings are segmented by advanced and emerging economies but may not represent uniform global stablecoin adoption.
Research limitations
- Geographic representation
Using the IMF classification of advanced and emerging economies, some regions or smaller economies may be underrepresented due to limited data availability.
- Stablecoin metrics: Aggregated figures from Tether, USDC, and others may obscure regional or sector-specific drivers of adoption.
- Traditional comparisons: Data from networks like Visa and Mastercard may align differently with blockchain-based metrics, limiting precision in comparisons.
The evolving nature of stablecoin regulations may affect the relevance of some findings over time as policies continue to shift globally.
- Case study generalization
Examples like PayPal (PYUSD), Stripe (USDC), and Grab (USDC) illustrate benefits but may only partially capture the diversity of use cases across industries and regions.
- Focus on USD-pegged stablecoins
The emphasis on USD-pegged stablecoins may limit insights into stablecoins tied to other currencies or alternative models like algorithmic or commodity-backed stablecoins.
The report highlights key applications, such as remittances, but leaves other emerging use cases, like gaming or tokenized real-world assets, less explored.
- Technological assumptions
Findings assume stablecoins retain their current advantages, but shifts in blockchain scalability, regulatory pressures, or macroeconomic conditions could alter their impact.