Building the supply side for a DePIN
The foundation for every DePIN project is the physical assets that form the physical infrastructure. Storage providers, computing power lenders, or some form of physical asset providers are the cornerstone of the decentralized network structure.
Attracting suppliers who own or can deploy these assets is the first step in establishing a DePIN. This is the supply side.
Early DePIN projects incentivize the supply side primarily using token-based rewards (we also explore other incentives under DePIN Business). This approach helps bootstrap the network by creating a clear value proposition for potential participants – they can earn rewards for contributing their resources.
For example, Helium’s initial focus was incentivizing the rollout of their physical network hotspots, creating a geographically widespread foundation for their decentralized wireless services.
This approach helps attract individuals or companies to contribute their time and resources if it meets a few critical criteria. Below, you’ll find the set of initial considerations every new DePIN project should take into account.
Openness of hardware systems
Closed systems provide tighter control over device quality, ensuring network performance and simplifying technical support. At the same time, it limits the types of hardware that can be used, which may stifle innovation and potentially drive up costs.
Open systems foster greater flexibility and potentially faster expansion by allowing participants to utilize compatible off-the-shelf or even repurposed devices. Please note, however, that they introduce challenges in guaranteeing consistency and quality of service and may increase management complexity.
Device placement requirements
DePIN systems, where physical coverage is an issue, often require careful spacing. In wireless networks (Helium) or positioning systems (Geodnet), extreme local device density can lead to interference and poorer service.
In contrast, projects like the Render Network focus on maximizing total available computing power (GPUs) without the need for geographic spacing restrictions. Here, systems with distancing requirements can incentivize deployment in underserved areas or penalize oversaturation.
Affordability
Lower device costs reduce the entry barrier for contributors. This is crucial for DePIN projects, which leverage crowdsourced infrastructure and attract a broad participant base. Highly accessible DePIN systems benefit from crowdsourced deployment. Projects relying on expensive specialized hardware may find it more challenging to attract a large, distributed contributor base.
Scalability through network expansion.
Scalability is a key consideration for DePIN projects that want to expand reach and impact. By attracting more asset providers and expanding infrastructure deployment, projects can meet growing demand, enhance network coverage, and support a larger user base.
Along with scalability, supply-side distribution should be meticulously planned to avoid limiting exposure to specific regions. Take Filecoin as an example. The network’s miners in China account for over 80% of the network’s testnet storage mining power. This area’s concentration has caused centralization concern and criticism and poses a challenge to its growth.
Demand side considerations for DePIN
“Supply First, But Demand Must Not Be Neglected”
Many DePIN projects initially prioritize building a robust supply base. That’s not a bad approach; however, neglecting the demand side early on can be detrimental. A network delivering data for which there is insufficient demand will bring a limited return for the supply side unless demand is generated. And if there is demand, the available market needs to be reachable.
Unlike other Web3 verticals, DePIN systems can potentially generate early revenue by addressing the existing market’s needs and offering solutions that exceed the existing ones. This is arguably the greatest advantage DePIN holds over other Web3 sectors.
It also means DePIN can offer solutions that reach beyond the Web3 ecosystem and get its teeth into Web2-dominated markets. However, attracting users outside of Web3 turns out to be challenging for nearly all of the DePIN projects. We dive deeper into the competitive landscape further into the report.
It’s difficult to convince users, even when the advantage is as striking as potential cost savings of up to 80% and more – as in the case of Akash. Below, you can see a direct cost comparison between Akash and its top Web3 competitors.