In the preceding chapters, we explored various DeSoc platforms, evaluating their strengths, limitations, and current user engagement models. We’ve discussed how Web3 innovations are redefining core aspects of social media — such as user ownership, data privacy, and the creator economy. However, as mentioned in Chapter 2, these advancements don’t exist in isolation.
Major Web2 platforms, with their massive user bases and strong network effects, are also beginning to integrate Web3 features. These platforms now compete directly with Web3-native networks like Farcaster, Lens, Bluesky, and Fantasy Top. At the same time, their embrace of blockchain-based tools can act as a catalyst for broader Web3 adoption.
“The main challenge to decentralized social is, of course, the network effects that have been deeply embedded and established by the existing social paradigm.” – David Sneider, Co-founder of Lit Protocol
This raises a crucial question for founders and entrepreneurs of Web3 businesses and creators alike:
Is the rise of Web2 platforms adopting Web3 features a threat to decentralized social applications, or could it accelerate the adoption of DeSoc models?
The most significant threat from Web2 social networks lies in their massive user bases, established network effects, and user trust. These are crucial elements that Web3-native DeSoc platforms like Farcaster are still striving to build. If a platform like Instagram fully embraces NFT-based profiles like Lens does, it could offer this feature to over 2.1 billion monthly active users, instantly dwarfing the reach of any DeSoc network. For founders and entrepreneurs entering Web3 and DeSoc, it’s essential to recognize both the potential and the challenges posed by Web2 platforms embracing Web3 features.
This is a quick reminder of what we established in Chapter 2. Telegram is an excellent example of a Web2 platform seamlessly integrating Web3 features. With its TON blockchain at the core, Telegram’s Web3 App Center allows users to explore and interact with decentralized services directly within the platform. This integration shows how Web2 platforms can leverage Web3 while maintaining user experience.
On the one hand, Web2 platforms embracing Web3 may help boost overall adoption. On the other hand, they can dilute the decentralization ethos that platforms like Farcaster and Lens prioritize, offering Web3 features without the full benefits of decentralization. We’ve listed some notable Web3 applications integrated into Telegram’s ecosystem:
1. STON.fi (Decentralized Exchange):
2. Blockchain Games:
Remember that Telegram’s ecosystem still needs to be bigger and more developed than blockchain ecosystems like Ethereum or Solana. Many of the applications, especially the blockchain games, are basic and speculative, with minimal real-world value or use cases.
They introduce users to Web3, but as of September 2024, the apps themselves offer little beyond token speculation and in-game rewards. Nevertheless, they illustrate the potential of the Telegram ecosystem and demonstrate how even simple dApps can achieve great popularity.
3. Telegram Wallet:
That said, the Telegram Web3 ecosystem offers many promising elements, particularly wallet integration and fiat-to-crypto trading (Telegram P2P Marketplace). These allow for seamless payments and crypto transactions directly within the app, offering creators and businesses a way to interact financially with their communities.
This offers founders and entrepreneurs an opportunity to build tools and services that bridge social interactions with real-world financial utility. You also gain the chance to integrate crypto payments into social experiences without having to exit the Telegram ecosystem.
The advantages are evident and mainly relate to convenience and accessibility. But it’s not all peaches and cream for those who seek control and ownership of their data or want to avoid the risks involved in being part of a centralized authority.
Web2 platforms integrating Web3 features come with one significant caveat — they remain centralized at their core. This means the platform itself remains subject to censorship and centralized control.
If Telegram’s leadership faces legal or political pressure, it could be forced to limit or restrict services or even confiscate user wallets — a concern highlighted when Telegram’s founder Pavel Durov was arrested. In contrast, Web3-native DeSoc platforms like Lens, OpenSocial, Farcaster, and Steemit are fully decentralized and blockchain-based. Therefore, they are inherently more complicated to censor, more resilient to outside control, and offer users genuine autonomy.
By now, you’re fully aware of the evolution from Web2 to Web3. Next, you want to know where, in this evolving space, the real, tangible opportunities await those who want to build, create, or expand their presence within DeSoc. Follow us as we explore the specific strategies developers, entrepreneurs, creators, and users should focus on. This will help you choose your path to leverage the changing social media landscape.
The competition between Web2 platforms and fully decentralized social platforms is intense, especially considering that some Web2 platforms already share significant revenue with creators. For instance, platforms like OnlyFans allow creators to retain 80% of their earnings. That’s a massive improvement over legacy social media.
This creates a unique challenge for DeSoc-native platforms. Simply offering slightly higher revenue shares, such as 90% to 95%, won’t be enough to convince creators to transition. Switching to DeSoc also means additional user friction and costs for setting up wallets or managing private keys. Established Web2 platforms provide a smooth user experience that creators are familiar with, alongside network effects that are difficult to replicate by their decentralized counterparts.
Currently, the quickest route to success in DeSoc is through Telegram and Discord. The platforms boast massive user bases that Web3 entrepreneurs can immediately tap into. With over 950 million monthly active users, the opportunity is immense. Here’s what you gain:
We advise caution when relying on early-stage platforms that lack robust “real-world” use cases despite their growth potential. Such platforms will likely struggle to keep users interested beyond an initial hype, which could jeopardize the success of any projects you build on them.
Looking ahead, X seems poised to be the next Web2 platform to embrace Web3, likely during the 2025/2026 adoption cycle. X has shown interest in exploring cryptocurrency payments and blockchain-based identity features. With its massive user base, X could become a formidable player in the Web3 space, further intensifying the competition for DeSoc platforms.
X is likely an isolated case, though. The openness to Web3 may be the result of Elon Musk’s unique drive for innovation. David Sneider, Co-founder of Lit Protocol, believes that traditional Web2 platforms, like Instagram or TikTok, are unlikely to adopt Web3 features to the same degree as Telegram or potentially X.
“I don’t think they’re gonna implement Web3 mechanisms because it’s the antithesis of their business model.” – David Sneider, Co-founder of Lit Protocol
Sneider’s words stress the fundamental conflict legacy social media networks face with DeSoc. Decentralization ruins their core revenue models, such as ads and data monetization. For founders, this means focusing on platforms that are more inherently aligned with decentralization or that are actively experimenting with Web3 features.
Example: Chinese Web3 game developers have successfully built viral mini-games and blockchain-based products on Telegram’s TON ecosystem.
The real challenge for Web3-native DeSoc lies in improving the user experience. As technologies like account abstraction and zk-proof systems evolve, this friction will diminish, opening the door for seamless onboarding to fully decentralized platforms. For audiences who demand privacy, immutability, and full control, Web3-native platforms are uniquely positioned to serve them without the need for a Web2 middleman.
In the immediate term, influencers and creators can capitalize on Web2 platforms with integrated Web3 features. You can enhance monetization strategies without abandoning your established audience. Our prime examples, Telegram and Discord, are ideal for getting started.
That’s all very theoretical, and it may help to look at it with an example, such as NFT-gated access on Discord.
Imagine you’re running an exclusive NFT community for an AI Web3 group that offers premium market analysis and insights. Your goal is to monetize your content while building a loyal and engaged community. By leveraging Discord, where your audience feels at home, you can integrate Web3 features to create a secure, exclusive environment for your members.
How would you do it?
1. Issue exclusive NFTs:
Onchain’s Membership NFTs are an excellent example of how utility-based NFTs can go beyond art. Our utility NFTs offer access to reports and other exclusive content, a token-gated Discord channel, and even future airdrops. Onchain’s Founding Membership is limited to 2,500 NFTs that also provide lifetime discounts and the world’s first Web3 Insights Marketplace. This is a unique opportunity for entrepreneurs and founders to create tokenized membership communities with tangible value.
2. Set Up NFT verification bots with Matrica.io:
4. Create exclusive channels:
5. Offer premium benefits:
Real-world scenario:
Let’s say “Alpha Crypto Research” is a company that provides cutting-edge market insights. Here’s how they might use this system:
By integrating Matrica.io’s NFT verification with Discord, you create a powerful platform that merges the familiarity of Web2 with the innovative potential of Web3. This approach allows you to monetize your expertise effectively while building a dedicated community around your brand. It exemplifies how decentralized technologies can enhance traditional platforms to provide new value to businesses and their audiences.
For creators and businesses focused on long-term brand control and authentic engagement, being early on Web3-native platforms like Lens, OpenSocial, or Farcaster can also be interesting. Web3-native, entirely decentralized platforms let creators leverage NFTs, governance tokens, and direct crypto payments to monetize in ways that even Telegram and Discord Web3 integrations cannot match.
Additionally, your content cannot be censored or removed arbitrarily, which is a threat even on Discord and Telegram. Businesses and creators can directly engage with a Web3-aligned audience that values decentralization, data ownership, and blockchain innovation.
For creators and businesses seeking to connect with the Ethereum-aligned community, Farcaster offers a unique opportunity:
Imagine you’re an Ethereum influencer or a blockchain development firm aiming to deepen your engagement with the Web3 community. By establishing a presence on Farcaster, you can:
Decentralized social networks empower you to establish self-sovereign identities. You own and manage your digital identity without relying on centralized authorities that determine what, where, and how your data can be shared. With decentralized social graphs and blockchain-based authentication, you can:
Ownership of data is another significant advantage. Traditional platforms often collect and monetize user data without explicit consent. DeSoc platforms give you control over your data in different ways:
With the help of enhanced engagement and rewards, you turn from being a passive consumer into an active participant You can:
“Decentralized platforms are rewriting the rules of engagement, turning consumers into creators and followers into stakeholders.” Ambreen Khral, Market Researcher
Imagine you’re an active member of the Ethereum community and join a DeSoc platform like Lens Protocol. You can:
Getting started as a user:
Sponsored by Pass App
Find your passion, onchain
Discover personalized web3 opportunities with the most seamless and safe smart wallet.
Visit the Pass App website
Decentralized social media networks are still in their early stages and already face significant competition from platforms like Telegram and Discord, which are steadily integrating Web3 features. While X appears positioned to adopt more Web3 elements, regulatory hurdles may slow its progress. Should X and other traditional social media platforms move deeper into Web3, DeSoc-native platforms will face even more significant challenges.
That said, if these larger platforms are slow to embrace Web3 fully, DeSoc projects will have a unique opportunity to carve out their space. DeSoc platforms must prioritize rapid growth, leveraging market cycles with strategies like airdrops and network effects to accelerate adoption.
“The biggest challenge for DeSoc platforms is bootstrapping growth and creating network effects to compete with established giants like Facebook. DeSoc must scale rapidly, leverage airdrops, and offer compelling features to drive adoption.” — Leon Waidmann, Head of Research at Onchain
Web3-native platforms like Farcaster or Lens hold a fundamental advantage as they are natively integrated into the Web3 ecosystem. This allows them to adopt new features and innovations rapidly. Additionally, they are more closely aligned with the ideals of decentralization and user ownership, which resonates with the Web3 community.
Platforms focused on specific ecosystems, such as Farcaster’s focus on Ethereum or potential networks tied to Solana, Sui, or other strong communities, seem best positioned for long-term survival. These community-driven platforms — much like Telegram’s TON-based ecosystem, have the advantage of a dedicated user base, which is crucial for thriving amid competition from larger, more established platforms.