Our research framework
This report follows a multi-faceted research methodology to analyze the Web3 consumer application landscape. We combined qualitative and quantitative research methods to assess adoption trends, technological advancements, business models, and real-world use cases. Our approach integrates user surveys, onchain analytics, case study evaluations, and comparative market research to provide a well-rounded analysis.
Methodology
1. Data collection methods
We conducted two comprehensive surveys: one targeting 1,005 Web3 users and another involving 660 founders and executives, all building or actively using consumer-facing blockchain applications. The survey gathered insights on adoption barriers, onboarding challenges, token incentives, and preferred ecosystems.
Survey participant breakdown:
1. Company stage (founders and executives)

2. Web3 consumer app involvement (users)

- Onchain analytics
We analyzed transaction volumes, active wallet addresses, and engagement metrics using Dune Analytics, Etherscan, and other blockchain data platforms to evaluate real-world traction.
- Case studies
We conducted in-depth testing of Web3 consumer applications such as Gnosis Pay, Blackbird, WiFi Map, Silencio, and Fuse Pay. This allowed us to assess usability, onboarding processes, and retention strategies.
- Comparative market analysis
We benchmarked Web3 consumer apps against traditional Web2 Fintechs and loyalty platforms such as PayPal, Stripe, and Revolut to identify competitive advantages and friction points.
- Industry reports and expert insights
We incorporated secondary data from market research firms, crypto-native think tanks, and regulatory bodies to provide a broader industry perspective.
2. Case study evaluation criteria
To ensure a structured and consistent analysis, we developed an evaluation framework that assesses each Web3 consumer app based on:
- Onboarding and UX
How easy is it for non-crypto-native users to set up and navigate the application?
- Incentive design and tokenomics
Does the app rely on sustainable token incentives, or does it depend on speculative token models?
- Real-world utility and adoption
Does the app solve tangible consumer problems or primarily cater to crypto-native users?
- Regulatory and compliance factors
Are there legal hurdles that could affect the app’s ability to scale?
- Revenue models and sustainability
Does the app generate revenue beyond token incentives, such as merchant fees, premium subscriptions, or other monetization strategies?
Applying this structured framework, we extracted actionable insights to highlight what works and what does not in Web3 consumer applications.
Research limitations
While this report provides a comprehensive analysis of Web3 consumer applications, you should note certain limitations:
- Rapidly evolving market
The Web3 industry changes quickly, with new technological advancements and regulatory shifts regularly emerging. Findings in this report reflect the current state of Web3 but may evolve.
- Survey sample bias
Despite efforts to include a broad demographic, survey respondents were primarily individuals already engaged with Web3. Survey results may underrepresent perspectives from mainstream consumers new to the Web3 industry.
- Limited geographic scope
While emerging markets play a crucial role in Web3 adoption, this report primarily focuses on North America, Europe, and selected Asian regions due to data availability.
- Challenges in measuring long-term viability
Many Web3 consumer applications are in early developmental stages, making assessing long-term sustainability and mass adoption potential difficult.
- Regulatory uncertainty
Web3 consumer applications operate in a fluid legal landscape. While we analyze current regulations, future policies may impact adoption and compliance strategies.